(1) This procedure supports implementation of the Melbourne Polytechnic Work Integrated Learning (Higher Education) Policy. The process defined in this procedure supports the planning, design, initiation, monitoring, support and assessment of work integrated learning (WIL) experiences to ensure that they are: (2) Unless a requirement is noted as mandatory, this procedure is intended to guide decision-making rather than imposing strict conditions. The procedure should be applied flexibly, taking the specific circumstances of the student, the WIL partner, and the overall learning objectives of the WIL experience into account. (3) For the purpose of this procedure the following definitions apply: (4) Not all WIL experiences will require detailed planning – for example, where a WIL placement is based on previous course requirements and arrangements. However, appropriate levels of input from curriculum designers, teaching staff, the student and the WIL partner should be sought at each stage of the design, planning, implementation, monitoring and assessment of WIL experiences, especially when they are newly-established. (5) The following procedure includes five (5) key steps, each supported by a checklist to support decision-making at each stage of the design, planning and management of the WIL experience. (6) The steps are outlined in detail in Sections (Stages) 3.1 - 3.5: (7) This step in the procedure is used to define or review learning outcomes and requirements where: (8) This step is used by curriculum design staff when designing a new WIL course. New WIL courses require review and approval by the Director Curriculum Unit and Head of Program. This step is also used by teaching staff to ensure that proposed WIL experiences are aligned and integrated with curriculum requirements. (9) Refer to clauses 16-23 of the Melbourne Polytechnic Workplace, Industry and Community Experience Policy for definitions of authentic learning and assessment approaches that support the development of ‘practitioner’ skills, behaviours and attributes. (10) This step in the procedure is used to: (11) This step is used by the Melbourne Polytechnic WIL Coordinator when identifying future WIL opportunities and partners. It is also used by course coordinators and teaching staff when identifying a proposed WIL experience for a student, with advice from the Melbourne Polytechnic WIL Coordinator if required. (12) Undertakings, agreements, or memoranda of understanding establishing WIL arrangements between Melbourne Polytechnic and industry partners must be reviewed and approved by the Director Curriculum Unit and Head of Program. (13) This step requires consultation with students who have special access or learning requirements. (14) This step in the procedure is used to: (15) This step is used by the Melbourne Polytechnic WIL Coordinator when evaluating risk and quality of future WIL opportunities and partners. It is also used by course coordinators and teaching staff when evaluating risk and quality of a proposed WIL experience for a student, with advice from the Melbourne Polytechnic WIL Coordinator if required. (16) This step also requires consultation with students who have identified a preferred WIL experience, or who have special access or learning requirements. (17) This step is MANDATORY for new WIL partners who have not been previously evaluated by the Melbourne Polytechnic WIL coordinator, the course coordinator or the responsible teaching staff member. (18) This step in the procedure is used to support detailed design of the WIL experience. (19) The Melbourne Polytechnic (1) WIL Coordinator and/or the (2) Head of Program or Course Coordinator, will define general standards and design requirements for WIL experiences and communicate these to teaching staff. (20) Where the WIL experience is based on a previous placement or well-established arrangements, this step may only require confirmation of the intended arrangements between the teacher, student and WIL partner. (21) When this is not the case, this step must include consultation between the student and the relevant member of teaching staff, and confirmation of the proposed approach with the WIL partner. (22) This step in the procedure is used to ensure that the WIL experience is properly supported, monitored and assessed. (23) Where the WIL experience is based on a previous placement or well-established arrangements, this step may only require confirmation of the intended approach between the teacher, student and WIL partner. When this is not the case, this step must include consultation between the student and the relevant member of teaching staff, and confirmation of the proposed approach with the WIL partner. (24) The Melbourne Polytechnic WIL Officer Coordinator and/or the Course Coordinator will define general support, monitoring and assessment requirements for WIL experiences and communicate these to teaching staff. (25) Outcomes of requirement Task 3.5 – (d.) – ‘Define and conduct a post-WIL experience evaluation’ should be periodically reported to the Melbourne Polytechnic WIL Coordinator and provide to the HECC in summary form. (26) The HECC should also be informed of specific WIL experiences that have exceptionally negative or positive outcomes. (27) The HE Director will advise of any process and governance changes that are required on the basis of WIL evaluations to the Executive Director Academic Operations and Director Curriculum Unit. (28) Work Integrated Learning (WIL) Policy (29) Work Integrated Learning (HE) Student Agreement (30) Work Integrated Learning (HE) Partner Agreement (31) Course Development (HE) Policy (32) Course Development (HE) Procedure (34) Assessment (HE) Procedure (35) Student Code of Conduct Guidelines (36) Supporting Students with Disabilities Policy (37) Student Equal Opportunity, Discrimination and Harassment Policy (38) Staff and Student Diversity and Inclusion Policy (39) TEQSA Guidance Note: Course Design (including learning outcomes and assessment)Work Integrated Learning (HE) Procedure
Section 1 - Purpose
Section 2 - Definitions
Top of PageSection 3 - Procedure
Identify or Review Learning Outcomes and Requirements
Identify WIL approach and options
Evaluate quality & risk of a proposed WIL experience
Co-design the WIL experience
Define support, monitoring, assessment and evaluation approach
Top of Page
WIL Coordinator
Section 4 - Supporting Documents and Templates
View Current
This is not a current document. To view the current version, click the link in the document's navigation bar.
Stages
Sections 3.1 - 3.5 Overview
Responsibilities
3.1
Identify or review learning outcomes and requirements
MP Staff (a – e )
Student (a)
3.2
Identify WIL approach and options
MP Staff (a - e)
Student (a)
WIL Partner (d)
3.3
Evaluate quality & assess risk of a proposed WIL experience
MP Staff (a - e)
Student (d, e)
WIL Partner (d)
3.4
Co-design the WIL experience
MP Staff (a – d)
Student (a - c)
3.5
Define support, monitoring, assessment and evaluation approach
MP Staff (a – f)
Student (b, d)
WIL Partner (d)
3.1 Task
Responsibility
Notes
a. Identify/Review course learning outcomes
Head of Program /Course Coordinator
Curriculum Designer
Review and confirm practice-based course-level learning outcomes that the WIL experience is required to support.
b. Identify/Review course accreditation (WIL) requirements
Head of Program /Course Coordinator
Curriculum Designer
Quality Consultant HE
Check course handbooks to review and confirm any WIL requirements that may be required by an industry accreditation body. This would normally include the required volume of learning and applicable conditions.
c. Identify/Review assessment criteria
Subject Coordinator /Curriculum Designer
Identify/review and confirm assessment criteria for the WIL experience.
d. Define high-level learning plan
Head of Program /
Course Coordinator
Curriculum Designer
Define an overall learning strategy that will support course and subject learning outcomes and the required assessment approach, including:
Overall learning approach
Required volume of learning (to meet accreditation requirements if applicable)
Alignment to AQF level
Assessment options/approaches.
Refer to the Melbourne Polytechnic Workplace, Industry and Community Experience Policy for definitions of WIL leaning approaches and assessment of ‘practitioner’ skills, behaviours and attributes.
e. Identify delivery requirements
Head of Program /
Course Coordinator
Curriculum Designer
Identify teaching and learning requirements:
Learning support resources – e.g. methodologies, standards and materials that support development of transferrable professional skills, behaviours and attributes
Reflective learning resources – e.g. student journal, portfolio, workbook or logbook
Teaching support – i.e. approach to monitoring, support and guidance
Role of the WIL partner.
3.2 Task
Responsibility
Notes
a. Check student access requirements. Identify any special access or requirements. Document a WIL Learning Plan support
WIL Coordinator
Disability Liaison Office (if required)
Student
In reviewing student access to WIL experiences, consider the following supporting Melbourne Polytechnic policies:
b. Identify WIL options
Head of Program / Course Coordinator
WIL Coordinator
Disability Liaison Office (if required)
Identify a WIL approach that supports identified learning goals and student access requirements.
Options include:
Internship
Placement
Volunteering role
OR
Virtual/remote internship or placement
OR
Industry-based or Community-based project
OR
An experiential learning approach or approaches.
Experiential (practice-based) learning approaches may include:
Major project
Supervised practice (e.g. OSCE, studio work, innovation hub)
Industry-supervised applied research (fieldwork or participatory action research)
Simulated practice (including laboratory, studio, workshop-based, or computer-aided approaches)
Design-thinking (e.g. collaborative design of a portfolio of work)
Conference or symposium paper or research article (for research-based disciplines).
c. Identify WIL partner options
Director, Industry and Government Partnerships
WIL Coordinator
Identify possible partner(s) to support the intended WIL approach.
3.3 Task
Responsibility
Notes
a. Identify preferred WIL partner based on outcomes of 3.1 and 3.2
WIL Coordinator
Head of Program / Course Coordinator
Select a preferred WIL partner (based on outcomes of previous steps) and reach an ‘in principle’ agreement between preferred WIL partner, teacher(s) and student.
b. Evaluate WIL partner safety profile and retain a record as per Melbourne Polytechnic Record Management Policy
WIL Coordinator
Subject Coordinator
OHS Manager
Evaluate the safety profile of the intended WIL partner, including:
Health status of the student and any reasonable adjustments that may be necessary (note: may require completion of a student medical disclosure form)
Risk profile of the site or workplace and any special safety requirements, such as personal and protective equipment (note: may require completion of a formal risk assessment)
Provision of workplace health and safety, anti-discrimination, and bullying and harassment prevention policies, training and protections by the WIL partner (mandatory).
Do not proceed where there are significant risks that cannot be eliminated or controlled. Advise WIL partner and identify another option.
c. Evaluate WIL partner alignment to learning plan and retain a record as per Melbourne Polytechnic Record Management Policy
Head of Program / Course Coordinator
WIL Coordinator
Evaluate the WIL partner’s ability to support the objective defined in the learning plan (see 3.1 – d.) This includes availability of an appropriate:
Role, with varied tasks and functions
Supervisor or manager
Workspace and work tools (if applicable)
Placement within a team environment
Administrative support to monitor and evaluate the WIL experience.
Do not proceed where these basic requirements cannot be met. Advise WIL partner and identify another option.
d. Define WIL partner agreement. Obtain agreement with WIL partner and sign-off process.
Retain a copy of the agreement and attachments.
HE Manager Subject Coordinator
WIL Coordinator
Student
Placement Provider - Placement Provider Supervisor
Subject to evaluation of risk and quality meeting required standards, set up an agreement with the Placement Provider (WIL partner) using the standard WIL placement agreement form. This include defining:
Note the Melbourne Polytechnic Partnering Framework for how to approach partnership and a guide to effective stakeholder communications.
Workplace health and safety, bullying and harassment, and workplace conduct requirements
Intellectual property, confidentiality and any other requirements set by the WIL partner
Any required permits or certifications (e.g. working with children, first aid)
Obtain sign-off for required agreements as needed.
e. Expectations of WIL defined to students via communications that outline WIL requirements, required documentation, and any verifications. Retain copy of documentation.
Subject Coordinator
WIL Coordinator
Student
Define key WIL requirements with the student before the commencement of an approved WIL placement. For example, working with children’s check, police checks, construction induction card (white card) and WIL placement contract in respect to program and industry requirements.
Details of requirements are defined in the Student Placement Handbook and relate to clauses 16-18 of the WIL Policy.
3.4 Task
Responsibility
Notes
a. Define workplace learning activities
Subject Coordinator
WIL Coordinator
Student
Broadly define expected learning activities – for project-based learning, this includes a high-level project plan, including intended locations, timeframes, materials and resources.
b. Schedule key milestones and timelines
Subject Coordinator
WIL Coordinator
Student
Schedule key milestones or ‘check points’ – for project-based learning, this includes project phases and timelines.
c. Define required inputs and outputs
Subject Coordinator
WIL Coordinator
Student
Identify and define required inputs, including materials, like a toolset, and required output(s) – this should include all deliverables for project-based learning.
d. Finalise assessment process
Subject Coordinator
Finalise the assessment process, criteria and standards and provide assessment forms to the student and WIL partner.
3.5 Task
Responsibility
Notes
a. Develop support materials (if required)
Curriculum Designer
General Counsel
Develop any support materials required to assist the student through the WIL experience. This may include materials to enable the student to develop and apply:
Transferrable skills
Behaviours and attributes
Reflective practice.
This must include a Student Placement Handbook for each relevant subject. The handbook sets out to define (but is not limited to):
Principles of Work Integrated Learning
WIL guidelines and program (specific to subject/qualification)
WIL Schedules
Staff and student roles and responsibilities
WIL student preparation and requirements
Supervision and assessment structure
Availability of services and support
Process for at risk students
Insurances
Health precautions and safety requirements
This may also include forms, templates, plans and agreements created as an outcome of the WIL design, along with detailing the planning process that will support the WIL experience from an administrative perspective.
b. Define a monitoring and ‘check-in’ approach
Subject Coordinator
WIL Coordinator
Student
Make arrangements to ensure that there is an appropriate level of monitoring of the WIL experience that supports:
Early intervention to resolve issues as, or before, they arise
Clear contact points for the student and the WIL Partner to reach relevant teaching staff and/or appropriate Melbourne Polytechnic services
An appropriate level of progress checking against the agreed learning plan.
c. Define assessment approach
Subject Coordinator
Curriculum Designer
Define a clear assessment approach that supports formative and summative assessment opportunities, including:
Formal assessment of course and subject learning outcomes according to defined criteria (e.g. an assessment rubric) by teaching staff
Assessment of intended learning outcomes, transferrable professional skills, and expected behaviours and attributes of the student by the WIL partner
Student self-assessment via reflective practice – this may include review of notes taken throughout the WIL experience in a diary, journal, logbook, portfolio or other evidence of activities and performance.
d. Define and conduct a post-WIL experience evaluation
Subject Coordinator
WIL Partner
WIL Coordinator
Student
Conduct an ‘exit interview’ or other evaluative process with the student and WIL partner to assess the effectiveness of the specific WIL experience, ‘lessons learnt’ and feasibility of future engagements with the same partner.
Report outcomes to the WIL Coordinator and Course Coordinator. Advise HECC of summary and/or exceptional outcomes of evaluations.
e. Advise HECC of summary and/or exceptional outcomes of evaluations.
WIL Coordinator
Subject Coordinator
Head of Program / Course Coordinator
HE Manager
Develop a report that summarises student / WIL partner feedback including any commendations and recommendations for continuous improvement
f. Review and update WIL resources as part of Continuous Improvement cycle
Subject Coordinator
WIL Coordinator
Curriculum Designer
Review all documentation including templates used by all parties during WIL activities and make updates as needed.